If you are a Canadian and a non-resident of the United States and you gamble at U.S. based casinos, chances are you have paid, or will eventually pay the Internal Service's dreaded casino gambling tax. Like almost all other taxes, the gambling tax is levied on income. In the case of the casino gambling tax, the taxable income stems from United States based gambling wins.
This message of taxes deferral has never changed. Yet after the Tax Simplification Act of 1986 the top tax brackets were less than one half of the 1974 rate. With the lower tax brackets, 85% of taxpayers fall in the 15% tax bracket or lower. This means that taxpayers contributed significant portions of funds now in retirement plans while they were in or below the 15% tax bracket. What are the odds that their tax rate will be less than 15% in retirement? Much has changed in the tax code since 1974. A "provisional income test" now determines the portion of what once was tax-free social security benefits that are now subject to income taxes. Because of this test, income sources such as an IRA distribution could increase the taxable portion of social security in addition to the tax due to the IRA distribution by up to 85%. In other words, with no other change to income or deductions, a $10,000 IRA distribution could increase taxable income by $18,500. A retired taxpayer could pay federal taxes on IRA distributions in excess of 27% even when remaining in the 15% bracket; the rate could be even more for taxpayers in the 25% tax bracket. State income taxes only exacerbate the tax rate. To say the least, the provisional income test makes estimating income taxes on IRA distributions quite complicated.
As noted earlier, Canadians are legally entitled to obtain a U.S. casino tax rebate. The right to obtain a tax refund for U.S. taxes paid is explicitly stated in the U.S. Canada tax treaty. Most Canadian gamblers are unaware of this fact, and simply accept the gambling tax levied at the casino.
These couples live comfortably on the pension and Social Security retirement benefit, therefore each has decided to use IRA distributions for the sole purpose of paying property taxes. The income tax consequence of the distribution needs to be determined and paid. Since each of the taxpayers is in the 15% tax bracket, a simple calculation of the distribution divided by 0.85 should be all it takes to yield the gross distribution required. Yet because of the provisional income test and the lack of itemized deductions, this calculation is anything but simple. We have determined the percentage of federal tax on the distribution is 21.5%, 24.6%, 25.7%, and 26.2% respectively even though none exceeded the 15% bracket even after the distribution. Minnesota has a top tax bracket of 7.85% yet the rate on the distribution is 8.1%, 9%, 9.3% and 9.9% without the proposed increase to state taxes.
When Canadian gamblers approach the IRS and attempt to apply for a U.S. casino tax rebate, the IRS will generally ask the Canadians to submit their ORIGINAL passports, and will keep the passport for at least 6 weeks. This is done ostensibly to find proof of identity. It also serves to make things so incredibly inconvenient and unreasonable for the Canadian gamblers, the Canadian gamblers almost inevitably give up on their attempts to obtain a U.S. casino tax rebate, thus also allowing the IRS to keep the Canadian gambler's casino gambling tax. .
The biggest problem come comes up working as a sole trader is that your personal assets become liable if you are facing a lawsuit. If a contractor is not aware of this fact then they could lead themselves towards bankruptcy. There are other options available to them which empower them to a certain degree. They can create their own limited company which acts as a barrier from unlimited liability, and cut down the taxes they have to pay at the end of the year.
This message of taxes deferral has never changed. Yet after the Tax Simplification Act of 1986 the top tax brackets were less than one half of the 1974 rate. With the lower tax brackets, 85% of taxpayers fall in the 15% tax bracket or lower. This means that taxpayers contributed significant portions of funds now in retirement plans while they were in or below the 15% tax bracket. What are the odds that their tax rate will be less than 15% in retirement? Much has changed in the tax code since 1974. A "provisional income test" now determines the portion of what once was tax-free social security benefits that are now subject to income taxes. Because of this test, income sources such as an IRA distribution could increase the taxable portion of social security in addition to the tax due to the IRA distribution by up to 85%. In other words, with no other change to income or deductions, a $10,000 IRA distribution could increase taxable income by $18,500. A retired taxpayer could pay federal taxes on IRA distributions in excess of 27% even when remaining in the 15% bracket; the rate could be even more for taxpayers in the 25% tax bracket. State income taxes only exacerbate the tax rate. To say the least, the provisional income test makes estimating income taxes on IRA distributions quite complicated.
As noted earlier, Canadians are legally entitled to obtain a U.S. casino tax rebate. The right to obtain a tax refund for U.S. taxes paid is explicitly stated in the U.S. Canada tax treaty. Most Canadian gamblers are unaware of this fact, and simply accept the gambling tax levied at the casino.
These couples live comfortably on the pension and Social Security retirement benefit, therefore each has decided to use IRA distributions for the sole purpose of paying property taxes. The income tax consequence of the distribution needs to be determined and paid. Since each of the taxpayers is in the 15% tax bracket, a simple calculation of the distribution divided by 0.85 should be all it takes to yield the gross distribution required. Yet because of the provisional income test and the lack of itemized deductions, this calculation is anything but simple. We have determined the percentage of federal tax on the distribution is 21.5%, 24.6%, 25.7%, and 26.2% respectively even though none exceeded the 15% bracket even after the distribution. Minnesota has a top tax bracket of 7.85% yet the rate on the distribution is 8.1%, 9%, 9.3% and 9.9% without the proposed increase to state taxes.
When Canadian gamblers approach the IRS and attempt to apply for a U.S. casino tax rebate, the IRS will generally ask the Canadians to submit their ORIGINAL passports, and will keep the passport for at least 6 weeks. This is done ostensibly to find proof of identity. It also serves to make things so incredibly inconvenient and unreasonable for the Canadian gamblers, the Canadian gamblers almost inevitably give up on their attempts to obtain a U.S. casino tax rebate, thus also allowing the IRS to keep the Canadian gambler's casino gambling tax. .
The biggest problem come comes up working as a sole trader is that your personal assets become liable if you are facing a lawsuit. If a contractor is not aware of this fact then they could lead themselves towards bankruptcy. There are other options available to them which empower them to a certain degree. They can create their own limited company which acts as a barrier from unlimited liability, and cut down the taxes they have to pay at the end of the year.
About the Author:
Frank Miller has a Debt Consolidation Blog & Finance, these are some of the articles: Personal Loans For Poor Credit Can Discipline Side Effects Of Negative Credit You have full permission to reprint this article provided this box is kept unchanged.
No comments:
Post a Comment